Screen time
Screen time: why willpower isn't enough
One internet user in three has already tried to limit their screen time. Many slip back, and feel guilty. Yet the problem isn't you: it's a phone designed to capture your attention. And against a tool, the best weapon isn't willpower, it's another tool.

You're not the only one trying
In 2023, 35% of French internet users aged 15 to 74 had already tried to cut down on screens, and half of those under 30 (Insee, 2024). One in four says they cut into their sleep to stay in front of a screen. If you recognize yourself, you're part of the majority, not an exception.
A phone designed to keep you there
The feed that never ends, the next video that starts on its own, the notification that lands at just the right moment, the recommendations calculated for you: none of it is an accident. Free apps live off our attention, and entire teams work to hold on to it a few minutes longer. Up against that, the willpower of a tired person on a weeknight doesn't stand a chance.
The phone has an effect even when you're not using it: its mere presence on the desk reduces available attention (Ward et al., 2017), and an ignored notification is almost as distracting as a message you reply to (Stothart et al., 2015).
The fridge metaphor
In a phone, as in a fridge, there are good things and bad things. Eating better doesn't rest on willpower alone: you also have to change what's in the fridge. As long as the cake sits on the middle shelf, you end up eating it.
It's the same with the smartphone. As long as it's designed to capture our attention, our efforts are in vain. You don't win by resisting harder; you win by changing the tool: by making the addictive gesture a little harder, and the useful gesture a little easier.
What the studies that work have in common
Effective methods share one thing: they change the environment, not the person.
- A pause of a few seconds before opening an app makes people abandon a third of their openings (Grüning et al., 2023).
- A black-and-white screen lowers screen time by about 39 minutes a day (Holte and Ferraro, 2020).
- Ten minutes a day per social network reduces loneliness within three weeks (Hunt et al., 2018).
- One hour less a day improves well-being, more durably than quitting entirely (Brailovskaia et al., 2023).
Changing the fridge, in practice
- Make the bad gesture longer: remove the icons, open apps by typing their name, add a wait.
- Decide before, not during: set your time before going into an app, while your head is still clear.
- Remove what never ends: Reels, Shorts, suggestions.
- Keep the rest easy: messages, maps, music, everything that genuinely serves you.
That's the idea behind Livetime. Change the home screen, the one place every app opening goes through, rather than piling up blockers. Read the manifesto.
Frequently asked questions
Is it an addiction?
The word is debated among researchers, and only a health professional can talk about addiction for a given person. What's certain is that apps use mechanisms that make stopping hard, and that feeling overwhelmed is very common.
Why do blockers only work for a while?
Because they sit on top of the phone without changing it: the home screen and its icons stay, and they switch off in a few taps at the moment the urge is strongest. The solutions that last change the tool itself.
Sources
The studies cited are summarized, with their links, on the Studies page.
Written by Emile Clement, a student and the creator of Livetime, after two years of testing almost every screen-time solution out there.


